Count top NFC and case-normalized word-like tokens with total, unique, deterministic tie, displayed-row, multilingual segmentation, and semantic limitations.
Built for AnalysisLive, copy-ready output1 guided projectPrivate in your browser
Use this result well
A quick decision brief for this specific tool
Inputs that matter
The text you want to inspect
Output to expect
A labeled set of measurements derived from that text
How it works
A browser-side analysis that leaves the source text unchanged
Use a representative text sample for meaningful measurements.
Treat measurements as editorial signals rather than automatic quality judgments.
Choose your path
Built around the job you need to finish
Count and rank the top displayed NFC/case-normalized word-like tokens in the exact entered text with explicit segmentation, tie, truncation and semantic limits.
Content editor checking repetition
See repeated surface tokens without a hidden stop-word or importance claim.
Enter the exact draft, inspect total/unique tokens and top rows, then review repetitions in context.
Can revise or retain wording without interpreting frequency as quality or engagement.
Multilingual or corpus reviewer
Preserve accented and non-Latin letters and know how word-like boundaries were derived.
Test case, accents, combining marks, CJK and mixed scripts; inspect NFC normalization and runtime segmentation disclosure.
Can reproduce displayed rows and identify linguistic limitations.
Claims, brand or accessibility reviewer
Prevent frequency output from becoming a sentiment, originality, keyword, bias or clarity verdict.
Compare the rows with the claim/source matrix and affected-person review rather than optimizing automatically.
Can reject unsupported interpretation while retaining the descriptive record.
Authoritative checks for this tool
Outputs and checklists are planning aids. Review the linked current authorities and the records, terms, instructions, and requirements that apply to your exact situation before a consequential decision.
Intl.Segmenter supplies locale-sensitive word-like candidates when available; a documented CJK/whitespace fallback is used otherwise.
Normalization and ranking
Tokens are normalized to NFC and locale-lowercased, stripped only of non-letter/number/mark edges, counted, sorted by descending count and then by token for ties, and truncated to 10 display rows.
Decision boundary
Frequency is not importance, keyword quality, originality, sentiment, bias, clarity, truth, accessibility or causal performance evidence.
Updated: August 2026
Example Scenarios
Inspect repeated surface forms in context instead of automatically deleting the most frequent term.
Review token boundaries and fallback status before comparing counts across languages or versions.
Compare repeated terms with the source and claim matrix without treating frequency as a truth, quality, originality or performance score.
FAQ
The Tool counts normalized surface forms. It does not perform stemming, lemmatization, synonym grouping or semantic analysis.
No. The panel shows the top 10 rows and separately reports total and unique word-like token counts.
No. Function words, names, repeated disclosures and formatting can dominate frequency, and context determines meaning.
Rows sort by descending count and then by normalized token, so equal-frequency results remain reproducible.
Tokens are normalized to NFC and locale-lowercased before counting. This does not make separate words or meanings equivalent.
About Unicode Word Frequency Counter
The panel shows the top 10 normalized surface tokens from the exact text. It preserves Unicode letters, numbers and combining marks, but it does not stem, lemmatize, merge synonyms or infer meaning.